Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yanaki Milev vs Petr Nesterov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Milev vs Nesterov analysis and find out who is favored!
Yanaki Milev vs Petr Nesterov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Milev 1 - 0 Nesterov
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Milev has won 47.39% of points on their second serve, while Nesterov has won 50.42%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Milev, in recent form, has won 52.57% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nesterov has won 52.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.12% and 37.15% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Milev has saved 57.63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nesterov has saved 61.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Milev has won 57.14% of matches played (W/L 36/ 27), with Nesterov winning 71.83% (W/L 51/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Milev has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 76/ 47), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Nesterov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 40/ 23).
- Player level: In the last year, Milev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.09% of matches (W/L 32/ 15), where as Nesterov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.46% of matches (W/L 50/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Milev winning 1 times and Nesterov being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Milev winning 2 and Nesterov winning 0. The last match between Milev and Nesterov was at the M15 Kursumlijska Banja, 22-09-2023, Quarterfinals, Clay with Yanaki Milev getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:52:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Milev and Nesterov have played a deciding set 0 times, with Milev winning 0 times and Nesterov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Milev winning 0, and Nesterov 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Milev has played against opponents with an average rank of 159.7 while Nesterov has played against players with an average rank of 175.01.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Milev has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nesterov has won 73% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Milev has converted 49.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nesterov has converted 47.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
536
Rank
482
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
491
Rank
489
High
21
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
60% (81-55)
Career Total W/L
65% (98-53)
64% (23-13)
YTD W/L
79% (22-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,870
1
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Yanaki Milev | Petr Nesterov |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:0 | 1:52:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 50% (26/52) | 61% (47/77) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (17/26) | 49% (23/47) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (11/26) | 37% (11/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 54% (7/13) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (43/77) | 46% (24/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Yanaki Milev
Player
Petr Nesterov
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
24 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yanaki Milev | Petr Nesterov |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (23/13) | 79% (22/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (53/34) | 66% (46/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (436/374) | 55% (365/297) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 68% (23/11) | 92% (12/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 78% (7/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.32 |
| Aces Total | 105 | 103 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 133 | 45 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:12 | 1:51:18 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 115.61 | 144.43 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1497/2607) | 63% (1242/1968) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1027/1497) | 67% (834/1242) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (526/1110) | 51% (371/726) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (143/288) | 48% (100/209) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1120/2542) | 43% (828/1926) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 73% (22/8) | 81% (21/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (23/36) | 78% (21/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 86% (6/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 53% (8/15) | 80% (12/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 84% (25/21) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 16% (25/4) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 75% (12/9) |
Yanaki Milev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Gorazd Srbljak
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
94
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Keisuke Saitoh
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Yanaki Milev
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Pierre Delage
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Gokberk Saritas
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Ruslan Tiukaev
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Koray Kirci
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Koray Kirci
Player
Yanaki Milev
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Yanaki Milev
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Petr Nesterov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Petr Nesterov
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Alessandro Bellifemine
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Stefan Adrian Andreescu
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Elliot Benchetrit
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
55%
(
12 of
22)
1st Serve %
70%
(
16 of
23)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
13 of
16)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
25
Total Points Won
20
|
5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Ioan Alexandru Chirita
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Pietro Marino
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Mihai Alexandru Coman
57%
(
55 of
96)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
12
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
54%
(
52 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
58 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Niels Lootsma
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
79 of
134)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
52 of
79)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
36 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
54 of
134)
121
Total Points Won
116
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Carlo Alberto Caniato
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Milev Vs Nesterov Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
